Leadership is defined as an ability possessed by an individual, which is characterized by influencing the way a person or a work group acts. In the following article we will talk about the theory of leadership, which classifies each leader by their way of leading a group. This can vary depending on what criteria it takes into account, it can be Autocratic and Democratic or Participatory.
What are the types of Leadership?
In each of these types of leadership, it has advantages and disadvantages. In the chain of command of a company it is important to have a model to which to be accountable, and maintain order within the business structure. There is no specific type of leadership, this will depend on the personality of the workers, and which one fits best in the company, by seeing the advantages and disadvantages of the types of leadership, we will be able to determine for which circumstances one or the other is better.
autocratic leadership
It is in which one person assumes all the responsibilities. Decisions are not delegated because the leader does not believe the people under his command are competent. Among the main characteristics, it stands out for the existence of a domain by the leader, null contribution by other individuals, under this type of leadership rules are strictly followed. Companies with this type of leader suffer from problems in the area of ​​human resources.
This type of leadership has advantages and disadvantages as a result of its way of working. Among the advantages is: meeting the objectives set efficiently, doing what is necessary to continue with a project, there is no remorse when it comes to firing an inefficient worker and the established time goals are usually met. Its disadvantages are that the workers feel little valued, it generates a bad work environment, it causes stress among the workers and it generates little sense of belonging to the company.
Democratic or participatory leadership
Democratic leadership or also known as participatory, unlike autocratic leadership, in this the decisions of others in the work group are taken into account, promoting teamwork. The democratic leader delegates functions to his other people under his charge, without any discrimination, integrates others to participate by giving ideas, regardless of whether he agrees or not, seeing different points of view about an objective, which helps correct mistakes.
This type of leadership has the advantage that it facilitates the integration of workers, allows them to participate by contributing ideas, promotes teamwork, increases job satisfaction and improves the quality of decisions. The advantages it has are good, but it has disadvantages that can affect the company, such as giving way to abuse of freedom if it does not establish limits, the leader can become dependent on the collaboration of his workers, if there is no maturity on the part of the team. can fail.
Examples of types of leadership
Since we know the concept and what characterizes each type of leadership, we must know where they are applied. Each one has advantages and disadvantages, which make it better depending on what the company requires and how a company defines its objectives. Then we will see examples of the types of leadership, and in what circumstance a type of leadership works best.
example of autocratic leadership
When companies want to increase their productivity, they opt for managers who have autocratic leadership that helps achieve this goal. There are several examples of autocratic leaders known for their success, such as the filmmaker Ridley Scott, the first Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, called the “Iron Lady” for taking over the plans of the country, Roger Ailes television producer, was president of the Fox network news where I modify the news broadcast, this thanks to his autocratic leadership.
example of democratic leadership
More than for a company, democratic leaders are necessary for the people, there are examples of great humanist personalities who were participatory leaders, such as Gandhi, Teresa of Calcutta, Nelson Mandela and Martin Luther King. They were not unsure of their vision, but they accepted ideas from their followers.
